Differences in Students' Thinking Skills in Making Decisions Through Online Learning Based on Google Classroom Applications on Ecosystem Materials

Nilawati Nilawati; Dewi Cahyani

doi:10.24235/sc.educatia.v10i2.9077

Differences in Students' Thinking Skills in Making Decisions Through Online Learning Based on Google Classroom Applications on Ecosystem Materials

Nilawati Nilawati^(1*), Dewi Cahyani⁽²⁾,

(1) Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(2) Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Independent learning needs to be done in online learning to search, observe, and discover until you conclude what has been learned. Provisions in the 21st century that students must have, namely critical thinking and solving problems, it is necessary to make decisions to identify and decide the best decisions in the future, students are trained to solve a problem and must be able to make decisions. Ecosystem material with natural cases identified problems until reaching the right solution is one of the successes of decision making. The purpose of this study is to describe the online learning process based on the google classroom application for ecosystem materials and describe the differences in decision-making skills between male and female students through online learning based on the google classroom application for ecosystem materials. The method used in this research is to use a quantitative approach with a comparative research design. The research was conducted at SMAN 1 Jamblang with a sample of 14 male students and 14 female students. The quota sampling technique is a comparative quantitative method using data collection techniques and instruments in observation sheets, multiple-choice questions, and documentation: statistical descriptive analysis techniques, inference, observational analysis, and analysis of decision-making skills. The research process begins with determining the study's time and location and drawing conclusions. The online learning process for ecosystem materials is in the range of 51%-75% (good implementation), and there are significant differences in decision-making skills between male and female students through online learning based on the google classroom application on ecosystem materials for class X MIPA 1 at SMAN 1 Jamblang.

Keywords

Online learning, Decision-making, Ecosystem material, Thinking skills

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agung, P., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2013). Differences in Thinking Ability and Biology Learning Outcomes of Class X Sma Negeri 7 Malang Based on Gender With the Application of Jigsaw Strategy. Journal of Biological Education 1(1)

Alika, et al. (2017). Urbanites edition 4 - the decision-making process for choosing a university and study program: A case study on students of the faculty of technology and design (FTD). Jaya Development University Printing.

Aminuddin, L. (2016). Gender Concepts and Issues In Islam. Journal of Ihya Al-Arabiyah, 2(1).

Andi, T. (2014). Differences in Coping Mechanisms between Male and Female Students in Facing Semester Exams at the Tarbiyah Faculty of IAIN Raden Intan Lampung. Journal of Guidance and Counseling 1(1)

Andini et al. (2019). Application of google classroom application-based blended learning to improve the cognitive ability of class X students on ecosystem materials at SMAN 1 Ciwaringin. Indonesian Journal of Natural Sciences, 2(2), 85 â€“ 98.

Arbain, J. (2015). Gender Thinking According to Experts: A Study of the Thoughts of Amina Wadud Muhsin, Asghar Ali Engineer, and Mansour Fakih. Sawwa Journal, 11(1).

Arifin & Benjamin. (2020). Effectiveness of Online Learning Media Through Google Classroom. Journal of Islamic Education, 11(2).

Ariyana, Y., Bestary, R., Yogyakarta, U. N., & Mohandas, R. (2018). Learning Handbook Oriented on Higher Order Thinking Skills. Directorate General of Teachers and Education Personnel: KEMENDIKBUD.

Awalludin. (2018). The Effectiveness of Decision-Making Models in Learning to Write Persuasive Paragraphs for Class X Smk Trisakti Baturaja. Journal of Bindo Sastra, 2(1), 159â€“167.

Aziz. (2008) Why Women Are More Creative Than Men?. Journal of UIN Malang, 1(1).

Brizendine, L. (2010). Female Brain. Phoenix Publishing Project

Desmita. (2012). Developmental Psychology of Students. PT Teen Rosdakarya

Handarini, O. I., & Wulandari S. S. (2018). Online to draw causal claims from non-randomized studies of primary care interventions. Journal of Office Administration Education (JPAP). 35(5), 639â€“643.

Herson, A. (2014). The decision-making process for developing the quality of madrasah Herson Anwar. Journal of Islamic Education, 8(1).

Juono. (2015). Gender Equality in Islamic Education. Journal of Islamic Studies. 15(1).

Khairunnisa, R., & Setyaningsih, N. (2017). Metacognition Analysis of Students in Social Arithmetic Problem Solving in terms of Gender Differences. Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Mathematics Research and Learning (KNPMP II) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 18 March 2017

Kris, T. (2018). Brain & behavior. ANDI Publisher

Mahrita, H. J. (2019). The Use of Google Classroom Applications in Mathematics Learning Think Pair Share Type at Smkn 3 Banjarmasin. Proceedings of SenpikaII, FKIP Mathematics Education Study Program, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, 12 October 2019.

Mandella, S. et al. (2021) Early Scientific Reasoning Ability of High School Students based on Gender in Ecosystem Materials. Journal of UNJA, 7(2).

Maulidya, A. (2018). Thinking and problem-solving. Journal of Arabic Language and Literature Education 4(1)

Mindra, P. (2020). Corona Chart July 13: New Cases Drop, Patients Recovered Soared. [Online] Accessed from the news.detik.com website on July 13, 2020.

Netty, K. (2015). Sex Roles, Gender and Occupational Bias. Pamator Journal, 8(2).

Novianti, M. (2020) Differences in Student Learning Outcomes Based on Gender in Biology Subjects. Journal of Equalita, 2(1).

Novita & Endah (2018). The Role of Gender in Decision Making in the Reformation Era in Police Institutions. Journal of M-Progress, 8(2).

Ratu, H. D. (2015). The Effect of Gender Relations and Decision Making on the Performance of State Junior High School Teachers (SMP Negeri) in South Bekasi District, Bekasi City. Journal of Educational Management, 6(2).

Rakhmawati, P. (2021). Google Classroom Based Learning, Geoogle Meet And Zoom Teachers SMP Negeri 2 Batubara. Journal of Community Service, 1(4).

Rofiq, A. A. (2016). The Importance of Social Decision Making Skills for Junior High School Students. Psympathic: Scientific Journal of Psychology, 2(2), 175â€“184.

Sabran & Edy. The effectiveness of Google Classroom as a learning medium. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Research Institute of Makassar State University on Dissemination of Research Results through Optimization of Syntax and Intellectual Property Rights.

Sadikin, A., Hamidah, A., Pinang, K., Jl, M., Ma, J., Km, B., Indah, M., Jaluko, K., Kode, KM, & Indonesia, P. ( 2020). Online Learning in the Middle of the Covid-19 Pandemic (Online Learning in the Middle of the Covid-19 Pandemic). Journal of Biological Education, 6(1), 214â€“224.

Samsul Anwar, et al. (2019). Male or Female, Who is Smarter in the Learning Process? A Evidence From The Survival Analysis Approach. Journal of Psychology, 18(2), 281-296.

Sanjaya, M.S.M, Wahidin, Maryuningsih Y. (2019). Application of Entrepreneurship-Based Biology Learning on Environmental Pollution Materials to Improve Students' Decision-Making Skills. Indonesian Journal of Natural Sciences, 2(1).

Sari, M. (2015). Critical Thinking in Making Decisions. Journal of Nursing. 8(2).

Septikasari Resti & Frasandy Nugraha Rendy (2018). 21st Century 4c Skills in Basic Education Learning. Journal of Tarbiyah Al-Awlad, 8(2), pages 112-122

Setiawan, Y. (2012). Gender Role in Audit Decision Making. Scientific Journal of Accounting Students, 1(2).

Siagian. (1990). Decision Making Theory and Practice. PT. Template: Jakarta.

Soenarko, K. G., Andayani Y., & Edi, J. (2018). Decision Making Skills and Chemistry Learning Outcomes of Students at SMA/MA Negeri Mataram in applying learning methods. MIPA Incandescent Journal, 13(2).

Sri, Y. (2013). Gender Differences in Language Mastery from the Perspective of Educational Psychology. Scientific Journal of Education 13(1)

Sriwiyati. (2021) Online Teaching to Increase Student Participation and Study Completeness in Biology Subjects in High School with the Google Classroom Platform. Edumaspul Journal, 5(1).

Sugiyono. (2010). Quantitative, qualitative, and r&d research methods. Alfabeta.

Sukmawati. (2021). Implementation of the Utilization of Google Classroom in the Online Learning Process in the Industrial Era 4.0. Online Creative Journal, 8(1).

Sulistyorini. (2009). Biology 1. In Biology 1 for Senior High School/Madrasah Aliyah Class X. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education.

Suyadi. (2018). Brain Differentiation of Male and Female Kindergarten Teacher Nyai Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta: Study of Early Childhood Islamic Education from Gender and Neuroscience Perspective. Journal of Gender Studies 13(2).

Syahruddin, A. (2018). Differences in brain structure and learning behavior between men and women; explanation in neuroscience and philosophy. Indonesian Philosophy Journal 1(1)

Trianto. (2010). Integrated Learning Model. Earth Literacy.

Wiratna, S. (2020). Research methodology. New Press Library.

Wulandari, S., & Rasmawan, R. (2016). Description of Decision-Making Skills in Environmental Pollution Materials for Chemical Education Students, Fkip Untan. Untan's Journal, 1(1), 1â€“12.

DOI: 10.24235/sc.educatia.v10i2.9077