Researching EFL Students' Disengagement in an Online Content-Teaching Classroom

Candra Dewi Dwika Wardani(1*), Yustinus Calvin Gai Mali(2),


(1) Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
(2) Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Research proves that students’ engagement becomes an important role in the teaching and learning process in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the teaching and learning process had to be conducted online with its restrictions such as the limitation of doing face-to-face communication and the technological issue. Referring to those limitations, students’ disengagement is more likely to increase in online classroom setting. As based on Egbert’s (2021) task-engagement principles, this study explores factors that cause students’ learning disengagement in a Teaching English for Adult Learners (TEAL) class, especially during lecturers’ presentation sessions that were conducted through the Zoom application. To achieve the research goal, a total of seven (7) TEAL students in an English Language Education Program (ELEP) at a private university in Central Java, Indonesia were involved in this study. To collect the data, a semi-structured interview was used as the research instrument. Through a thematic analysis on the interview transcripts, the researcher revealed three main factors that caused students’ disengagement: social interaction, learning support, and task difficulty. Each of these factors were discussed and placed in the discourse of the engagement-related literature. At the end of the paper, the researcher presented practical recommendations for language teachers teaching in a similar context to improve their EFL student’s learning engagement and ideas for future research.

Keywords


EFL; online classroom; students' disengagement; TEAL

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting semi-structured interviews. In K. E., Newcomer, H. P., Hatry, & J. S., Wholey, (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19

Akhter, H., Abdul Rahman, A. A., Jafrin, N., Mohammad Saif, A. N., Esha, B. H., & Mostafa, R. (2022). Investigating the barriers that intensify undergraduates’ unwillingness to online learning during COVID-19: A study on public universities in a developing country. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2028342

Ansong, D., Okumu, M., Bowen, G. L., Walker, A. M., & Eisensmith, S. R. (2017). The role of parent, classmate, and teacher support in student engagement: Evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 54, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.03.010

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2006). Introduction to research in education. California: Wadsworth.

Balderas-Solís, J., Roque-Hernández, R. V., Salazar-Hernández, R., & López-Mendoza, A. (2021). Experiences of undergraduates’ emergency remote education in Mexico. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2000846

Banna, J., Lin, M.-F. G., Stewart, M., & Fialkowski, M. K. (2015). Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course. The Teaching and Learning of Statistics: International Perspectives, 11(2), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23470-0_27

Baticulon, R. E., Sy, J. J., Alberto, N. R. I., Baron, M. B. C., Mabulay, R. E. C., Rizada, L. G., … Reyes, J. C. B. (2021). Barriers to online learning in the time of COVID-19: A national survey of medical students in the Philippines. Medical Science Educator, 31(2), 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01231-z

Bempechat, J., & Shernoff, D. J. (2012). Parental influences on achievement motivation and student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 315-342). New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_15

Brint, S., & Cantwell, A. (2014). Conceptualizing, measuring, and analyzing the characteristics of academically disengaged students: Results from UCUES 2010. Journal of College Student Development, 55(8), 808–823. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0080

Chesebro, J. W., & Borisoff, D. J. (2007). What makes qualitative research qualitative? Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459430701617846

Conrad, R.M., & Donaldson, J. A. (2004). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Dawson, C. (2009). Introduction to research methods: A practical guide for anyone undertaking a research project. Oxford: How To Books.

Egbert, J. (2020). Engagement, technology, and language tasks: Optimizing student learning. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.46451//ijts.2020.12.10

Egbert, J. (2020). The new normal?: A pandemic of task engagement in language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 314–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12452

Egbert, J., Abobaker, R., Bekar, M., Shahrokni, S. A., Bantawtook, P., Roe, … Huh, K. (2021). Language task engagement: An evidence-based model. TESL-EJ, 24(4), 1–34. https://tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej96/a3.pdf

Egbert, J., & Shahrokni, S. A. (2018). Principles of CALL. Open text WSU. https://opentext.wsu.edu/call/chapter/principles-of-call/

Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215-217. DOI: 10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149

FBS UKSW. (2019). FBS Student Handbook 2019. English Language Education Program, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Flores, M. E., & Brown, C. G. (2019). An examination of student disengagement and reengagement from an alternative high school. School Leadership Review, 14(1), 62–77. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/slr/vol14/iss1/5

Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Wang, M., & Brauer, S. (2019). Profiles of school disengagement: Not all disengaged students are alike. In Fredricks, J. A., Reschly A. L., & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of sudent engagement interventions working with disengaged students (pp. 31-43). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science & Technology. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00003-6

Garrett, C. (2011). Defining, detecting, and promoting student engagement in college learning environments. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 5(2), 1–12. https://www.kpu.ca/sites/default/files/Teaching%20and%20Learning/TD.5.2.5.Garrett_Student_Engagement.pdf

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. California: Sage Publications.

Hastuti, G. (2021). Teaching English for adult learners [Syllabus]. English Language Education Program, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Hurst, B., Wallace, R., & Nixon, S. B. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons, 52(4), 375–398. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss4/5

Lester, D. (2013). A review of the student engagement literature. Focus on Colleges, Universities, and Schools, 7(1), 1–8. http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Lester,%20Derek%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20Student%20Engagement%20Literature%20FOCUS%20V7%20N1%202013.pdf

Mali, Y. C. G., & Salsbury, T. L. (2021). Technology integration in an Indonesian EFL writing classroom. TEFLIN Journal, 32(2), 243–266. http://journal.teflin.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1558

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2, 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615597674

Neuwirth, L. S., Jović, S., & Mukherji, B. R. (2021). Reimagining higher education during and post-COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 27(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477971420947738

Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning. System, 86, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102128

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). A call for qualitative power analyses. Quality and Quantity, 41, 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1

Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teacher’s autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B

Riasati, M. J. (2012). EFL learners’ perception of factors influencing willingness to speak English in language classrooms: A qualitative study. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(10), 1287–1297. https://www.idosi.org/wasj/wasj17(10)12/9.pdf

Sadoughi, M., & Hejazi, S. Y. (2021). Teacher support and academic engagement among EFL learners: The role of positive academic emotions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101060

Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749–752. https://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2017/vol3issue7/PartK/3-7-69-542.pdf

Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2013). Developmental dynamics of engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. Christenson, A. L., Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 21-44). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2

Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2017). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357

Sundari, H. (2017). Classroom interaction in teaching English as foreign language at lower secondary schools in Indonesia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(6), 147. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.6p.147

Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. New Jersey: Wiley.

Wang, H. (2009). Nonverbal communication and the effect on interpersonal communication. Asian Social Science, 5(11), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v5n11p155

Ware, M. (2008). Peer review: Benefits, perceptions, and alternatives. Information Sevice & Use, 28(2), 109-112. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2008-0568

Wilson, C. (2014). Interview techniques for UX practitioners: A user-centered design method. Massachusetts: Morgan Kaufmann.

Zacharias, N. T. (2012). Qualitative research methods for second language education: A Coursebook. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Pub.

Zeki, C. P. (2009). The importance of non-verbal communication in classroom management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1443–1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.254

Zhang, J., & Zhang, C. (2012). Sampling and sampling strategies for environmental analysis. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 92(4), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2011.581371




DOI: 10.24235/eltecho.v8i1.11830

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

This Journal is indexed by:

 

 

Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter
View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.