Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Numeracy Literacy Problems of Graph Representation Model in Elementary School
(1) Universitas Negeri Malang
(2) Universitas Negeri Malang
(3) Universitas Negeri Malang
(4) Universitas Negeri Malang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Abstract
This study aims to describe the types of student errors in solving numeracy literacy problems of graph representation models. This study used a mixed methods research design with a sequential exploratory type. The data collection techniques used were tests and interviews. The participants in this study were 30 elementary school students tested and six students selected by purposive sampling to be interviewed. The results showed that students experienced conceptual errors and procedural errors. In conceptual errors, 40% of students make errors in reading data, 43% between data, and 60% of students make errors beyond data. Conceptual errors occur when students cannot understand the context of the problem, cannot read the data, do not master the basic concepts of statistics, and do not understand number patterns. In procedural errors, 63% of students make errors in reading data, 73% of students make errors in reading between data, and 80% of students make errors in reading beyond data. Procedural errors occur when students are wrong in choosing the solution procedure, calculating, and predicting. Therefore, educators need to design appropriate learning strategies to minimize errors made by students in numeracy literacy questions on graph representation models, such as applying contextual learning-based numeracy problems.
Keywords: student errors, graphic literacy, numeracy literacy, elementary school.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan jenis-jenis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi numerasi model representasi grafik. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian mixed methods dengan tipe eksploratori sekuensial. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes dan wawancara. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah 30 siswa sekolah dasar yang dites dan enam siswa yang dipilih secara purposive sampling untuk diwawancarai. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa mengalami kesalahan konseptual dan kesalahan prosedural. Pada kesalahan konseptual, 40% siswa melakukan kesalahan dalam membaca data, 43% di antara data, dan 60% siswa melakukan kesalahan di luar data. Kesalahan konseptual terjadi ketika siswa tidak dapat memahami konteks soal, tidak dapat membaca data, tidak menguasai konsep dasar statistika, dan tidak memahami pola bilangan. Pada kesalahan prosedural, 63% siswa melakukan kesalahan dalam membaca data, 73% siswa melakukan kesalahan dalam membaca antar data, dan 80% siswa melakukan kesalahan dalam membaca di luar data. Kesalahan prosedural terjadi ketika siswa salah dalam memilih prosedur penyelesaian, menghitung, dan memprediksi. Oleh karena itu, pendidik perlu merancang strategi pembelajaran yang tepat untuk meminimalisir kesalahan yang dilakukan siswa dalam soal literasi numerasi pada model representasi grafik, seperti menerapkan soal literasi numerasi berbasis pembelajaran kontekstual.
Kata kunci: kesalahan siswa, literasi grafik, literasi numerasi, sekolah dasar.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aksoy, E. Ç., & Bostan, M. I. (2021). Seventh Graders’ Statistical Literacy: An Investigation on Bar and Line Graphs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10052-2
Alper, B., Riche, N. H., Chevalier, F., Boy, J., & Sezgin, M. (2017). Visualization Literacy at Elementary School. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5485–5497. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025877
Anggraini, N., Utomo, D. P., & Azmi, R. D. (2023). Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Minimum Competency Assessment Problems Based on Kastolan Theory. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol8no1.2023pp1-10
Asmara, S. D., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2023). Context of Data and Uncertainty: One of the Challenges for Numeracy Provision in Elementary School Teacher Education. Acta Scientiae, 25(6), 235–271. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7276
Becker, S., Knippertz, L., Ruzika, S., & Kuhn, J. (2023). Persistence, context, and visual strategy of graph understanding: Gaze patterns reveal student difficulties in interpreting graphs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020142. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020142
Bennison, A., Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2020). Utilising a research-informed instructional design approach to develop an online resource to support teacher professional learning on embedding numeracy across the curriculum. ZDM, 52(5), 1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01140-2
Binali, T., Chang, C.-H., Chang, Y.-J., & Chang, H.-Y. (2024). High School and College Students’ Graph-Interpretation Competence in Scientific and Daily Contexts of Data Visualization. Science & Education, 33(3), 763–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00406-3
Boote, S. K., & Boote, D. N. (2017). Leaping from Discrete to Continuous Independent Variables: Sixth Graders’ Science Line Graph Interpretations. The Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 455–484. https://doi.org/10.1086/690204
Börner, K., Bueckle, A., & Ginda, M. (2019). Data visualization literacy: Definitions, conceptual frameworks, exercises, and assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(6), 1857–1864. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807180116
Bragdon, D., Pandiscio, E., & Speer, N. (2019). University students’ graph interpretation and comprehension abilities. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(4), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1480862
Cahyana, U., Lestari, I., Irwanto, I., & Suroso, J. (2024). Development of a mobile learning network for science with augmented reality and its impact on students’ literacy and numeracy. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 7(2), 576–586. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v7i2.2685
Chinn, S. (2020). The Trouble with Maths: A Practical Guide to Helping Learners with Numeracy Difficulties (4th ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003017714
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publication: London.
D’Ignazio, C. (2017). Creative data literacy: Bridging the gap between the data-haves and data-have nots. Information Design Journal, 23(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.23.1.03dig
Ekawati, R., Susanti, S., & Chen, J.-C. (2020). Primary Students’ Mathematical Literacy: A Case Study. Infinity Journal, 9(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p49-58
Fujirahayu, A. R., Fitrianna, A. Y., & Zanthy, L. S. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Operasi bentuk Aljabar berdasarkan Teori Kastolan. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 5(6), 1813–1820. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v5i6.11203
Gal, I., Grotlüschen, A., Tout, D., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Numeracy, adult education, and vulnerable adults: A critical view of a neglected field. ZDM, 52(3), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01155-9
Granberg, C. (2016). Discovering and addressing errors during mathematics problem-solving—A productive struggle? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.02.002
Guo, D., Zhang, S., Wright, K. L., & McTigue, E. M. (2020). Do You Get the Picture? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Graphics on Reading Comprehension. AERA Open, 6(1), 2332858420901696. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420901696
Ivanjek, L., Susac, A., Planinic, M., Andrasevic, A., & Milin-Sipus, Z. (2016). Student reasoning about graphs in different contexts. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010106
Jungjohann, J., Gebhardt, M., & Scheer, D. (2022). Understanding and improving teachers’ graph literacy for data-based decision-making via video intervention. Frontiers in Education, 7(919152). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.919152
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Rapor Pendidikan 2022. Retrieved February 15, 2024, from Pusat Standar & Kebijakan Pendidikan website: https://pskp.kemdikbud.go.id/rapor_pendidikan
Kemendikbudristek. (2024). Rapor Pendidikan 2023. Retrieved February 15, 2024, from Pusat Standar & Kebijakan Pendidikan website: https://pskp.kemdikbud.go.id/rapor_pendidikan
Kolar, V. M., & Hodnik, T. (2021). Mathematical Literacy from the Perspective of Solving Contextual Problems. Mathematical Literacy from the Perspective of Solving Contextual Problems, 10(1), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.467
Kop, P. M. G. M., Janssen, F. J. J. M., Drijvers, P. H. M., & van Driel, J. H. (2020). The relation between graphing formulas by hand and students’ symbol sense. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(2), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09970-3
Lee, S., & Byun, T. (2022). Understanding high school students’ errors in solving genetic problems. International Journal of Science Education, 44(7), 1143–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2068205
Lian, L. H., Yew, W. T., & Meng, C. C. (2022). Assessing Lower Secondary School Students’ Common Errors in Statistics. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30(3), 1427–1450. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.3.26
Locoro, A., Fisher, W. P., & Mari, L. (2021). Visual Information Literacy: Definition, Construct Modeling and Assessment. IEEE Access, 9, 71053–71071. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3078429
Mathai, S., Krishnan, P., & Sreevalsan-Nair, J. (2024). Understanding Graphical Literacy Using School Students’ Comprehension Strategies. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 09731849241242855. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731849241242855
Merk, S., Groß Ophoff, J., & Kelava, A. (2023). Rich data, poor information? Teachers’ perceptions of mean differences in graphical feedback from statewide tests. Learning and Instruction, 84, 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101717
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Mulligan, J. (2015). Moving beyond basic numeracy: Data modeling in the early years of schooling. ZDM, 47(4), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0687-2
Nurrahmawati, Sa’dijah, C., Sudirman, & Muksar, M. (2021). Assessing Students’ Errors in Mathematical Translation: From Symbolic to Verbal and Graphic Representations. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20819
Oktradiksa, A., Mujahidun, & Hunt, C. (2023). A literacy and numeracy model to enhance the independent learning education for Islamic elementary school teachers. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 10(1), 106-114. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v10i1.12345
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/
Ozmen, Z. M., Guven, B., & Kurak, Y. (2020). Determining the Graphical Literacy Levels of the 8th Grade Students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(86), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.86.13
Pallauta, J. D., Arteaga, P., & Garzón-Guerrero, J. A. (2021). Secondary School Students’ Construction and Interpretation of Statistical Tables. Mathematics, 9(24), 3197. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9243197
Plasman, J., Gottfried, M., Williams, D., Ippolito, M., & Owens, A. (2021). Parents’ Occupations and Students’ Success in STEM Fields: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. Adolescent Research Review, 6(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-020-00136-z
Putri, C. K., Juandi, D., Kurniawan, S., & Sukri, S. (2023). High School Students’ Errors in Solving Statistical Literacy Test Similar to Minimum Competency Assessment. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v13i02.26153
Rufiana, I. S., Wahyudi, W., & Nurhidayah, D. A. (2020). Misinterpretasi Mahasiswa pada Representasi Histogram dan Box Plot. ANARGYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.24176/anargya.v3i2.5324
Setiawan, E. P., & Sukoco, H. (2021). Exploring First Year University Students’ Statistical Literacy: A Case On Describing and Visualizing Data. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(3), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.3.13202.427-448
Shiddieqy, A. F. A., Kartini, & Maimunah. (2024). An Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Higher Order Thinking Skills Problems on Number Patterns Using Newman’s Theory. JURNAL ABSIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 7(1), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v7i1.2718
Thomas, A., Tazouti, Y., Hoareau, L., Luxembourger, C., Hubert, B., & Jarlégan, A. (2023). Early Numeracy Assessment In French preschool: Structural analysis and links with children’s characteristics. International Journal of Early Years Education, 31(4), 1018–1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2021.1938518
Tsagaroulis, P. (2020). Data visualization, numeracy and graph literacy: Seeing and thinking of data presented as tables or charts. (Dissertation). Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Chicago.
Uyanik, S., Elbir, D., & Ozmen, Z. M. (2023). Determining the graphical literacy levels of the middle school mathematics teachers. Pedagogical Research, 8(2), em0158. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13003
Winarso, W., & Toheri, T. (2021). An Analysis of Students’ Error in Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: The Perspective of David Kolb’s Theory. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.753899
Yılmaz, N., & Ay, Z. S. (2016). Investigation of 8th Grade Students’ Knowledge and Skills about Histogram. Elementary Education Online, 15(4), 1280–1298. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2016.66174
Zeuch, N., Förster, N., & Souvignier, E. (2017). Assessing Teachers’ Competencies to Read and Interpret Graphs from Learning Progress Assessment: Results from Tests and Interviews. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12126
DOI: 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v11i2.18720
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AL IBTIDA Journal Indexed By:
2.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI Published by Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon In Collaboration with Perkumpulan Dosen Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (PD PGMI) Indonesia.
Editorial Office:
FITK Building, 5th Floor, Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Perjuangan Street of Sunyaragi, Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia 45132 Phone. 0231-481264, Fax. 0231-489926, Email: alibtida@syekhnurjati.ac.id/ alibtida2@gmail.com